The resolution adopted on Oct 29 at the fifth plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China represents far more than an institutional commitment to strengthen Party discipline.
The resolution, which focuses on persevering with full and rigorous Party self-governance, addresses a fundamental question of contemporary political economy: how can a political organization preserve its capacity to lead profound economic, technological and social transformations while continuously renewing itself?
At a time of rising geopolitical tensions, technological competition and structural changes in the world economy, China's approach places political leadership, institutional capacity and the well-being of the people at the center of its modernization strategy.
One of the most distinctive features of China's development model is the recognition that economic transformation requires a political organization capable of defining long-term objectives, coordinating resources and ensuring their implementation. Markets, technological innovation and industrial competition operate within a broader strategic framework oriented toward national development and collective prosperity.
The resolution thus acquires particular historical significance: it connects the modernization of China's governance system with the political and institutional conditions necessary to advance a new stage of socialist modernization.
The concept of self-reform expresses the CPC's determination to continuously improve its governing capabilities.
Rather than treating institutional strength as an irreversible achievement, self-reform recognizes that political organizations must constantly renew themselves to respond to changing historical circumstances.
The measures stipulated in the resolution seek to prevent corruption, bureaucratism, formalism and the misuse of public authority.
The significance of self-reform therefore extends beyond internal Party organization. It concerns the quality of governance and the capacity to preserve the public purpose of political power.
China has entered a new stage characterized by high-quality development, technological modernization and the pursuit of national rejuvenation. The resolution reflects the CPC's efforts to adapt to evolving international and domestic conditions while maintaining long-term national objectives.
One of the resolution's most important contributions is its emphasis on the comprehensive education, selection, supervision and continuous improvement of Party cadres.
Behind industrial parks, high-speed railways, scientific laboratories and technological breakthroughs lies an extensive organizational structure responsible for translating strategic decisions into concrete results. The resolution calls for cadres who combine political commitment, professional competence, ethical integrity, practical experience and administrative effectiveness. It also emphasizes merit-based selection, accountability, continuous learning and the ability to confront complex problems.
This combination is essential. Political conviction without technical competence cannot successfully govern a technologically sophisticated society. Technical expertise without public responsibility risks disconnecting development from collective interests.
The quality of cadres is therefore an important source of the CPC's strengths, alongside the tangible achievements of economic development, poverty alleviation, infrastructure construction and improvements in living standards.
The cadres' ability to plan, coordinate, implement and evaluate public policies constitutes a strategic national resource.
The resolution also underscores the importance of institutional rules and supervision. Effective governance requires mechanisms capable of identifying errors, correcting administrative deficiencies and ensuring that political responsibility is accompanied by accountability.
This is particularly relevant in a country whose scale, regional diversity and technological sophistication demand extraordinary levels of coordination. This is particularly relevant when examining the emergence in China of a new productive paradigm, which is based on the integration of artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced manufacturing, renewable energy, batteries, telecommunications and digital infrastructure.
China's technological transformation follows a distinctive sequence: innovation, industrial integration, large-scale production, cost reduction and technological diffusion.
These achievements cannot be explained exclusively through market mechanisms or individual entrepreneurial initiatives. They also reflect strategic planning, public investment, industrial coordination, scientific education and institutional continuity.
The political capacity to connect these elements is decisive.
Such a paradigm illustrates how technological development becomes a broader process of productive transformation when supported by coherent national objectives.
As China enters this new stage, Party self-reform acquires an additional strategic dimension: preparing political systems to govern an increasingly complex productive system.
The integration of artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing and strategic planning requires cadres capable of understanding scientific developments, anticipating risks, coordinating policies and evaluating the social consequences of technological change.
The resolution's emphasis on professional competence, accountability and continuous learning directly addresses these challenges, and reveals a fundamental characteristic of China's modernization: technological progress is embedded in a political project that seeks to orient economic transformation toward national development and improvements in people's well-being.
The modernization of productive forces must therefore be accompanied by the modernization of governance capabilities.
China's objectives of basically achieving socialist modernization by 2035 and building a great modern socialist country by the middle of this century require more than technological breakthroughs or economic expansion.
They demand institutional continuity, political adaptability, effective supervision and the capacity to ensure that development improves people's lives.
The resolution recognizes that corruption, bureaucratism, formalism and inadequate administrative performance can undermine these objectives.
Its insistence on rigorous self-governance reflects an understanding that modernization also necessitates improvement of the institutions responsible for directing it.
This understanding offers a broader reflection for political parties worldwide.
At a time when a series of new issues, including the surge of advanced technologies, pose challenges to governments around the world, the comprehensive training of officials must once again become a strategic priority. Ideological conviction, ethical integrity, technical competence and a genuine commitment to public service are all indispensable features of effective governance.
The vitality of a political party ultimately depends on its capacity to renew itself, remain connected to the public and retain the fundamental purpose of politics: governing for the people and demonstrating that commitment through tangible improvements in people's well-being.
An increasingly uncertain world has raised a question of universal relevance: how can political institutions develop the long-term capacity necessary to guide technological change toward collective prosperity?
The resolution offers China's answer: self-reform, disciplined governance, capable cadres, strategic planning and a sustained commitment to placing people at the center of modernization.
The author is Argentina's former ambassador to China and the president of the Center for Chinese Studies, University of Buenos Aires.
The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.
If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.
