On second thoughts, talks not a good idea

Until recently, I would not argue with friends from abroad when they talked about the necessity for China to open a dialogue with the Dalai Lama. I know little about this monk, am no expert on Tibet, and these friends sounded convincing that dialogue is more constructive than antagonism.

I still do not know much about the Dalai Lama and am still no expert on Tibet. But the recent happenings began to make me doubt about my friends' reasoning. Yes, it remains true that dialogue is more constructive than antagonism. But the question is, is the Dalai Lama qualified for such a dialogue?

To have a dialogue with China's central government, the Dalai Lama should at least have sufficient political capital. For instance, he should have enough authority among the domestic and overseas Tibetans communities so that they follow his doctrines and preaching.