China's idea for bridging incompatible global data rules

Why do data governance frameworks across countries often remain fundamentally incompatible? Drawing on comparative legal research, this Turkish youth explains that such differences are rooted in distinct geopolitical needs and institutional backgrounds. Rather than relying on forced standardization, he sees value in the coordinated pluralism promoted by the idea of a community with a shared future for humanity. This approach offers a way to respect legal diversity while still seeking cooperation and shared direction in global data governance.