Op-Ed Contributors

China-bashing based on bad economics

By Stephen S. Roach (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-04-07 07:58
Large Medium Small

The United States' fixation on the "China problem" is now boiling over. From Google to the renminbi, China is being blamed for all that ails the US. Unfortunately, this reflects a potentially lethal combination of political scapegoating and bad economics that could end in tears.

The political pressures are grounded in the angst of American workers. After over a decade of relatively stagnant real compensation and, more recently, a historically sharp upsurge in unemployment, US labor is being squeezed like never before. Understandably, voters want answers. It is all because of the trade deficit, they are told - a visible manifestation of a major loss of production and employment to foreign competition. With China and its so-called manipulated currency having accounted for fully 39 percent of the US merchandise trade deficit in 2008-09, Washington maintains that American workers can only benefit if it gets tough with Beijing.

Related readings:
China-bashing based on bad economics Labeling China a currency manipulator would hurt US more
China-bashing based on bad economics US would pay for strong yuan
China-bashing based on bad economics US denies report for sanctions deal with Beijing
China-bashing based on bad economics Much at stake in US' trade dispute

However appealing this argument may seem on the surface, it is premised on bad economics. In 2008-09, the US had trade deficits with over 90 countries. That means it has a multilateral trade deficit. Yet aided and abetted by some of America's most renowned economists, Washington now advocates a bilateral fix - either a sharp revaluation of the renminbi or broad-based tariffs on Chinese imports.

A bilateral remedy for a multilateral problem is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Unless the problems that have given rise to the multilateral trade deficit are addressed, bilateral intervention would simply shift the Chinese portion of America's international imbalance to someone else. That "someone" would most likely be a higher cost producer - in effect, squeezing the purchasing power of hard-pressed US consumers. Ironically, Washington's penchant for the bilateral fix to a multilateral problem risks turning the tables on American workers just at a time when they are struggling to get back on their feet in this feeble post-crisis recovery.

Instead of counterproductive China bashing, the US would be far better served if it took a deep look in the mirror and faced up to why it is confronted with a massive multilateral trade deficit. America's core economic problem is saving and it's not China.

   Previous Page 1 2 Next Page