Renaming can lower barriers for psychiatric hospitals

A hospital sign is meant to guide you to the help you need. But for some people, the words on that sign can cause hesitation before they even step inside.

This hesitation is why several psychiatric hospitals in China have recently opted for more neutral names, such as "People's Hospital" or "Brain Hospital". A sign does more than indicate the location. It can also shape a person's self-perception once they enter.

For a person suffering from mental distress, that can matter a lot. In everyday language, the Chinese term for "mental health problems" often carries negative connotations beyond medicine. It can suggest abnormality, irrationality, danger or a lack of self-control. Those associations influence how people discuss mental health and even the way they view themselves.

Consider two common requests for time off from work: "I need to see a doctor because I have a cold" and "I need to go to a psychiatric hospital because I cannot sleep". The first sounds routine. The second may cause hesitation.

That hesitation has a cost. Those dealing with anxiety, depression or chronic insomnia may downplay their condition, fearing judgement by colleagues, friends or relatives. Instead of seeking help early, they might endure the problem alone.

While a more neutral hospital name cannot eliminate these fears, it can lower one's help-seeking barrier. Those seeking help for insomnia might feel they are visiting a hospital rather than accepting a label they are not ready for.

There are precedents for changing medical terminology when words can create unnecessary anxiety. For example, the term "cervical erosion" has been replaced with "cervical ectropion", a term that more accurately describes the condition without suggesting disease. This shift illustrates how language can shape understanding, and a less alarming term can prevent misinterpretation.

The same logic applies to mental health. Mental health issues are not confined to psychiatric consulting rooms. Depression, for example, can mean different things to different people. A psychiatrist may focus on diagnosis and treatment, a school on student well-being, a counselor on emotions and personal development while an ordinary person might simply say "I'm under too much pressure", "I'm not myself lately" or "I can't stop overthinking".

These are not interchangeable feelings; they can coexist in the same person. That is why the changing role of psychiatric hospitals is important. Their potential clientele is not just people diagnosed with mental health issues but also those who are struggling, uncertain about what they are experiencing and simply looking for professional advice.

This reflects a broader shift in how mental health is understood. It's no longer just about doctors, patients and their families. Schools, workplaces, communities, governments and online platforms all face mental health concerns in different ways. The World Health Organization has likewise promoted a shift from institutional care toward community-based, person-centered mental health services.

As mental health becomes more closely connected to everyday life, psychiatric institutions have to reconsider their approach — who they serve, what services they provide and how people access them.

Traditional psychiatric hospitals focused on serious mental disorders and crises. A comprehensive mental health system requires more: early screening, counseling, prevention, treatment, rehabilitation and digital services. Individuals seeking help may not see themselves as patients. They may simply want to understand what is happening to them and decide on the specific support they need.

Seen this way, changing a hospital's name signals that mental health care is not just about treating serious illness but also about making professional help accessible before problems escalate.

But a new sign cannot erase old stigmas automatically. Prejudice against mental health issues is rooted in families, schools, workplaces, popular culture and social relationships. If people continue to associate mental health issues with danger, weakness or unpredictability, changing the name of a hospital will accomplish little.

There is also a risk of superficial change: changing the name without changing what happens inside the hospital. A hospital can change its old name overnight, but it takes much longer to improve the way patients are treated, the quality of its services, the accessibility of counseling and diagnosis, and the way mental health is discussed in public. If the institution remains intimidating and societal attitudes don't change, a more neutral name may be little more than a fresh coat of paint.

Still, this change is not meaningless. A hospital sign is part of the environment that influences people's decision to seek help. Lowering that first barrier is worthwhile, especially for people who are unsure if their distress warrants professional attention.

Changing a name won't change public perceptions, but it can signal that seeking help is not an admission of abnormality. It is simply a decision to take one's health seriously.

For someone hesitating at the door, that first step may matter more than it seems.

The author is director of the Department of Social Psychology at Nankai University's School of Sociology.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily. If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.