Newsmaker

WH gate crashers invoke constitutional rights

(Agencies)
Updated: 2010-01-21 09:32
Large Medium Small

WH gate crashers invoke constitutional rights
Michaele Salahi prepares to testify before the House Homeland Security Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 20, 2010. [Agencies]

WASHINGTON: White House gate crashers Tareq and Michaele Salahi invoked their US constitutional right against self-incrimination Wednesday, refusing to answer a House committee's questions about their uninvited appearance at a state dinner for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

The jet-setting couple repeatedly said they were remaining silent on advice of their lawyer, but that did not prevent members of the Homeland Security Committee from peppering them with questions about how they got through Secret Service checkpoints on November 24.

Related readings:
WH gate crashers invoke constitutional rights Gate-crasher 'screw up' won't be repeated: Obama
WH gate crashers invoke constitutional rights White House gate-crashers on list for Vegas party
WH gate crashers invoke constitutional rights Gate-crashers to take the Fifth if subpoenaed
WH gate crashers invoke constitutional rights Defense official communicated with WH crashers

Tareq Salahi read an opening statement in which he offered to have the couple's lawyers provide information about their appearance at the dinner. Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Democrat, rejected the offer.

A US jury is investigating the Salahis to learn how they got past the Secret Service, which protects the president, without invitations and shook hands with President Barack Obama.

The Salahis' attorney, Stephen Best, said in an interview prior to the hearing that the couple believed they were invited to an arrival ceremony for the prime minister and the White House receiving line for the dinner.

The couple was auditioning for a reality television show. The White House incident led to an apology from the Secret Service, and three of its officers were placed on administrative leave.

Members of the committee repeatedly told the Salahis that the safety of the president was not a joke, although some of the questions from frustrated committee members were less than serious..

The couple -- she dressed in a white jacket and skirt, he in a dark suit -- said they would be willing to return and testify after the criminal investigation is finished.

The couple could be charged under statutes that prohibit making false statements to federal agencies or using false pretenses to enter federal property.

Best said his clients "maintain their absolute innocence and have not committed any criminal wrongdoing whatsoever. They will contest any charges."

   Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page