President Hu stresses investment, IPR protection with U.S. business elite
(China IP)
Updated: 2012-01-09

Chinese President Hu Jintao got down to work shortly after his arrival in Hawaii on November 17th, meeting with a group of U.S. business leaders to exchange views on investment, trade and protection of intellectual property rights (IPR).

President Hu, on his second trip to the United States this year, made the remarks during a meeting with the leaders of top U.S. companies, including Keith Williams of Underwriter Laboratories, Michael Ducker of FedEx Express, and Thomas Donohue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

President Hu stresses investment, IPR protection with U.S. business elite

Hu emphasized that deepening and expanding mutually beneficial trade and economic cooperation between China and the United States is in the interests of both peoples and conducive to the global economic recovery and development. Sino-U.S. trade and economic relations are currently faced with both challenges and important opportunities, he said. "The opportunities lie in economic restructuring in both China and the United States," Hu said.

Hu emphasized that China stands firm in its determination to protect IP, adding that since China has already had a fairly sophisticated legal system in that regard, the future focus would be law enforcement. He said the two sides should properly handle trade frictions through consultations based on an equal footing and in accordance with market rules and WTO regulations.



Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

Can an expired patent be applied again?

What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?