Reports that Green GDP accounting could be ditched because of local
resistance are grossly exaggerated, a top official of the environmental watchdog
said yesterday in fact, the project will be expanded to the entire Chinese
Despite reports that some provinces were
dropping out of the green accounting project to protect their own interests, the
official told China Daily that the 2005 report will "actually expand to cover 31
provinces and municipalities," showing "a great leap forward for the concept of
Pan Yue, vice-minister of the the
State Environmental Protection Administration. [China Daily]
Officially called the Environmentally-Adjusted GDP Accounting Report, the
Green GDP report is intended to drive home to the public and officials the waste
created, and environmental damage done, in the process of economic growth.
Simply put, Green GDP is calculated by deducting the cost of natural
resources' depletion and environmental degradation from traditional GDP.
The report for 2005 will be released next month, said Pan Yue, vice-minister
of the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA).
The first report, for 2004, was published in September last year. Officials
told China Daily that the Green GDP report is a complex accounting project which
takes around two years longer than the compilation of conventional GDP figures
for a fiscal year.
The 2004 report showed that the financial loss caused by environmental
pollution totaled as much as 511.8 billion yuan ($64 billion), or 3.05 percent
of the nation's economy, based on the traditional GDP accounting method.
report will include two more indices to make the evaluation of environmental
losses more accurate, Pan said. One will compute the cost caused by
transportation pollution; and the other, the cost of pollution clean-up.
The effort was launched in March 2004 by SEPA and the National Bureau of
Statistics. In the last two years, an accounting analysis has been made of
physical quantification of environmental pollution, imputed treatment cost and
the environmental degradation cost for 42 industries.
Pilot projects were launched in the three municipalities of Beijing, Tianjin
and Chongqing, and the seven provinces of Hebei, Liaoning, Anhui, Zhejiang,
Sichuan, Guangdong and Hainan.
Pan admitted that initially, SEPA did meet with many difficulties ranging
from technical ones to resistance from regional and industrial officials. But
much to his relief, SEPA has managed to work with the 10 regional governments to
stick through, Pan said.
The general environmental situation remains bleak, as a result of what Pan
called catering to immediate interests and reckless energy consumption.
Last year, China flunked its target of cutting major pollutants by 2 percent,
which instead witnessed a growth of 2 percent.
Meanwhile, SEPA officials explained that the retirement last year of two
vice-ministers senior to Pan, Zhu Guangyao and Wang Yuqing, did not mean Pan was
SEPA does not have the position of a "first vice-minister" as some
Chinese-language press had reported, they said.