An Interview with A New American-Chinese Struggling to Contribute to A 
Harmonious China.
In last autumn, among tons of new books emerging in the market, four 
low-profile, but considered very important ones by some readers, showed up in 
China's major bookstores. They are about a concept rarely heard of by Chinese: 
"facilitation." Translated into Chinese as "Jian Dao," which literally means "to 
constructively guide", it introduced to Chinese readers a full set of principles 
and skills about how to practice participation and therefore improve the quality 
of cooperation in all kinds of organizations, be it business corporations, NGOs, 
schools or government agencies.
At the one year anniversary of publishing the facilitation books, China Daily 
website interviewed the chief editor of these books, Dr. Jason Jixuan Hu, who 
migrated from China to the United States in the 1980s and now is coming back 
running a small company WINTOP Consulting Group in Shanghai, providing 
facilitation skill training to corporate clients.
China Daily website: Why do you consider facilitation 
skill training so important for China?
Hu: Because I think it is the most important key to the next 
step of China's development. China has tons of problems waiting to be solved in 
its development path. Every problem needs to be solved or resolved or dissolved 
by a group of people working together. Facilitation provides basic also advanced 
ways of working together, in any kind of organization. Domestic companies need 
it to improve their group efficiency, MNCs need it to enhance their 
cross-cultural integration, NGOs need it to improve the effectiveness of their 
front-line social workers, and even government agencies could use it to advance 
their "government capacity." 
CD: So is it a general management skill or a leadership 
style?
Hu: Actually, facilitation means participatory management 
and we call it "Roundtable Leadership." In business corporations it helps to 
develop a culture of cooperation and synergy. If used in the political area, it 
leads to a new type of political system named "Co-operacy" by a well-known 
facilitator from New Zealand, Dr. Dale Hunter.
CD: "Co-operacy"?
Hu: In Chinese we translated it as "He Zhi" - to 
cooperatively govern. The word is coined to describe a new emerging paradigm of 
collective or consensus decision making as distinct from democracy and 
autocracy. It contains beliefs, values, methods, processes and techniques of 
facilitation that enable collective decision-making to work successfully. I 
think it is also a future organizational/political/social system for human 
societies based on improvements in the current Western style democracy. 
Autocracy is based on the belief that the best decisions are made by the best 
leader. Democracy is based on the belief that the best decisions are made by the 
majority. Distinguished from both of these, Co-operacy is based on the belief 
that the best decisions are made by involving everyone affected by the decision. 
CD: So it is a new type of 
democracy?
Hu: It is a much improved type of democracy 
that China can immediately adopt. Some people think that the traditional 
Western-style democracy might not be suitable for China. Indeed if what happened 
to George W. Bush's election happened in China, 650 million people would feel 
very unhappy for losing the candidate whose policies they like. In democracy you 
always have losers. In co-operacy, everyone wins through reaching a consensus 
under a set of commonly held values: equality, harmony in diversity, cooperation 
to achieve win-win solutions, and the best decisions are from those people 
affected by the decisions.
CD: Would you call this a socialist or a capitalist 
institution?
Hu: It's both and it's none. Actually it's high time that we 
thought out of the box of those old conceptual frameworks. I would say it will 
be the embodiment of "an Open Society," an ideal promoted by Karl Popper in the 
early part of the last century and later put into practice by George Soros 
through his famous foundation work which is very significant for the future of 
human society. In the business world, the same concept has a different name 
"Learning Organization," which is widespread in many corporations in China and 
well received by Chinese leaders already. The key is to develop a continuous 
learning capacity within organizations or societies. The concepts of socialism 
and capitalism are not useful anymore because there are so many types of 
socialism and capitalism being practiced in this world, your audience does not 
know which one you're talking about when you use these terms.
CD: So to practice facilitation eventually leads to 
co-operacy, learning organization and open society or harmonious society?
Hu: Exactly. And only an open society containing learning 
organizations could become a "harmonious society" that the Chinese Communist 
Party hopes to create. It is a new way to lead the people, via "Roundtable 
Leadership", and the skills can be learned. Harmony is a more challenging goal 
than the traditional Chinese ideal of "peace under heaven," because you could 
have that kind of peace where many people felt oppressed, but harmony has to be 
generated through increased participation. The government system needs to 
develop more capacity to foster harmony, and facilitation will play an important 
role in this process, since participation and facilitation are two sides of the 
same coin - the former is a status or principle and the later is an approach or 
skills needed to enable the former. We can even say that co-operacy is a 
necessary condition to build a harmonious society - when the decision process 
involves people being influenced by that decision, there will be more 
understanding, more execution incentives, and more sense of ownership of the 
decision.
CD: Since facilitation could be so important, what exactly 
it is?
Hu: President Hu Jintao in China's history first spoke of 
the concept of "Political Civilization." Facilitation helps to raise political 
civilization up to a new level better than Western democracy. That is from 
political sense. From organizational sense, it helps to create collective 
wisdom, unity and synergy. Why, because in any organization, whether a business 
corporation, or a cultural/social organization, or a political party, you always 
need to build your organizational consensus (mission, vision, strategy, plan, 
etc.) among the members of the organization in someway. The important issue here 
is what method you use to form that consensus. In ancient times people reached 
consensus via violence, in autocracy people reach consensus by following the 
most powerful leader, in democracy people reach consensus by voting and electing 
their representatives, in co-operacy people reach consensus through the 
"technology of participation," that is, facilitation skills widely used in 
various groups. I would say that the level of political civilization is 
determined by the methods that are used to reach consensus and to make 
decisions. What exactly it is? Facilitation is a collection of skills in 
communication, (how do you speak, how do you listen, how do you respect others), 
and a number of methods of reaching consensus among a group. The consensus could 
be a decision, a solution to a problem, a mission or vision for an organization, 
or a strategic plan for the next period of time. We have nine two-day training 
courses to teach a full set of these skills and are currently offering them to 
corporate clients. Now we are preparing to offer these training programs to 
government clients as well. 
CD: Sounds like you are continuing on a significant journey. 
Could you say a few words about how you decided to take on this task?
Hu: In my learning history I have been deeply influenced by 
four great mentors at genius level. The first is Professor Qian Xue-sen, whom I 
call "Uncle Qian" for family reasons, from whom I learned scientific rationality 
and a contributing spirit. The second is Mr. Nan Huai-chin, to whom I became a 
student in 1986 and from whom I learned inheritable values in Chinese culture 
and China's true history. The third is previously mentioned Mr. George Soros, an 
action-initializer who sincerely practices what he believes, from whom I built 
up much more understanding of Karl Popper's philosophy and enriched my knowledge 
in cybernetics. The latest one is John Sperling who was introduced to me by Mr. 
Soros. Mr. Sperling founded the largest education and training enterprise in 
North America, the Apollo Group. If you put these four mentors together and 
consider what kind of influence they could generate on me together, you'll see 
that my choice of taking on this effort to help transform China into a more open 
and more harmonious society is simply natural.