New photographs lend weight to allegations of 
revenge killings by US unit under attack in which 24 unarmed civilians died. 
 
 
   This image taken from a videotape made by a 
 Haditha, Iraq journalism student and obtained by Time Magazine via the 
 Hammurabi Human Rights Group, shows a scene in what appears to be a morgue 
 following an alleged fatal raid by United States forces which took place 
 on Saturday, Nov. 19, 2005, in Haditha, Iraq. The U.S. military is bracing 
 for a major scandal over the alleged killing of Iraqi civilians in Haditha 
 - charges so serious that they could threaten President Bush's effort to 
 rally support for an increasingly unpopular war. 
[AP] | 
Fresh photographic evidence seen by US 
investigators is believed to reveal that some of the 24 unarmed Iraqis killed in 
the Iraqi town of Haditha after an American died in a roadside bomb in November 
were in effect executed, it was reported yesterday.
According to 
Congressional and defence officials quoted by the Los Angeles Times, the 
pictures show wounds to the upper bodies of the victims, who included several 
women and six children. Some were shot in the head and some in the back. 
'There wasn't a gunfight, there were no pockmarked walls,' the paper reports 
a congressional aide as saying. And it quotes a US Defence Department official 
who had been briefed on the contents of the photos as saying 'the wounds 
indicated execution-style' shootings. 
US military investigators are probing the events of 19 November 2005, and a 
picture is gradually emerging of a small group of troops who lost control in the 
wake of an unrelated attack on their vehicle, which left one of their comrades 
dead. Other soldiers then helped to cover up the atrocity. 
Claims that US marines massacred Iraqi civilians threaten to undermine public 
support for keeping British troops in the country, the UK's most senior military 
officer said yesterday. The Chief of Defence Staff, Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock 
Stirrup, said that reports of the unprovoked killing of up to two dozen unarmed 
Iraqis would be 'appalling' if proved accurate. 
'Our people are in Iraq and other parts of the world doing difficult and 
dangerous things in unpleasant circumstances on behalf of their country and they 
need the support of the people in their country. This sort of accusation - and 
it is at the moment just an accusation, of course - does make that harder to 
achieve,' he told the BBC. 
Two parallel investigations are trying to piece together what happened in the 
incident. They were sparked by evidence first collected by Time magazine and 
Iraqi human rights workers. 
One probe, by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, is examining the 
killings, while another looks at any cover-up. Both are set to conclude in the 
next few weeks. It is widely expected that they will end with the courts martial 
of several marines and possible charges of murder. 
Some top US politicians involved with defence issues have already been 
briefed on the issue and they have told reporters that the evidence is damaging. 
'Marines over-reacted... and killed innocent civilians in cold blood,' 
Congressman John Murtha, a former marine, told the Washington Post. One retired 
general, David Brahms, told the newspaper: 'When these investigations come out, 
there's going to be a firestorm. It will be worse then Abu Ghraib. Nobody was 
killed at Abu Ghraib.' 
The incident happened after a hidden bomb exploded as a US marine unit passed 
through Haditha. One marine, Miguel Terrazas, was killed. Two other marines were 
also wounded in the blast. 
What happened next is the focus of the investigations. Eyewitnesses and human 
rights groups believe the marines swept through the town in a lust for revenge. 
The attack may have lasted for several hours. At the end of it, 24 Iraqi 
civilians had been killed. They included a 76-year-old amputee and a 
four-year-old boy. In one house an entire family, including seven children, were 
attacked with guns and grenades. Only a 13-year-old girl survived. 
British soldiers currently in Iraq said they were anxious to distance 
themselves from the Americans but that Iraqis did seem able to make a 
distinction. One private, who did not wish to be named, said: 'We are given an 
education: the Americans get shown how to use a gun. The Iraqis know the 
difference.' 
Captain Victoria Wedgwood-Jones, of 20 Armed Brigade, said: 'When the British 
come and say we are British, they welcome us warmly.'