China and the United States should see the bilateral strategic economic
dialogue (SED) as a mechanism to build a long-term relationship rather than a
forum to address pressing issues, a Washington-based researcher specializing in
China studies has said.
"The strategic economic dialogue is a great structure and it is an innovation
to have a dialogue that involves so many participants from both sides so that
dimensions of issues can be discussed instead of a narrow focus.
"But we should not have expectations for comprehensive agreements or (expect
it) to lead to concrete results within the two-day meeting," said Nicholas
Lardy, a scholar with the Peterson Institute of International Economics.
In order to deal with concerns such as the trade imbalance, Lardy suggested
the United States increase savings and reduce consumption at home while China
can reduce savings and increase domestic consumption, especially the percentage
of household and government expenditure in the gross domestic product.
As for complaints from US officials about the steps China has taken to open
up the financial market, Lardy said Beijing has done everything it promised to
the World Trade Organization.
"The record in the financial sector has been excellent, and I don't think
anybody can point to anything China failed to do (in terms of WTO commitments),"
(China Daily 05/23/2007 page2)