Study details spread of anti-Asian rhetoric online
Anti-Chinese or anti-Asian sentiment is often espoused under the guise of criticism of China, according to research on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A study conducted by York University in Toronto detailed how rhetorical mechanisms and tropes spread racism.
Fuyuki Kurasawa, a social sciences professor, explained that the "expression of forms of xenophobia or anti-Chinese … and anti-Asian sentiment often under the guise of criticism of China… in a way that is deliberately incendiary".
"That's certainly been a part of the racialization of the virus and racialization of the pandemic as we all know," he said during a virtual symposium hosted by the York Centre for Asian Research on Monday.
The pandemic has provided a kind of legitimacy to the expression of overt and sometimes more covert forms of such racism, which has led to physical and digital attacks on people of Asian ethnicity and has riven societies in the West since 2020.
He said the rhetoric ranges "all the way to forms of white supremacy and outright conspiracy theories (that) are explicitly racist".
"And this infodemic is a huge part of what is occurring with a kind of racist epidemic that is anti-Asian and specifically anti-Chinese," Kurasawa said.
He also said there has not been much overt or explicit racism because such expressions have become socially unacceptable in North America and Europe.
Social media platforms also have policies that ban or filter certain words or expressions of hate.
Instead, there is elusive racism or allusive racism operating through various rhetorical mechanisms.
For example, categorical conflation often refers interchangeably to China not only as a country, but also to the Chinese government or the Communist Party of China and Chinese people in general.
Such rhetoric imputes responsibility not only to the Chinese state and the Party, but also to the Chinese people for the viral outbreak and the global spread of the coronavirus and the resulting deaths in Western countries.
"We're seeing the kind of attribution of certain characteristics which are both easily attributed to a government entity or a political party, but also to a whole ethnic or racial group," Kurasawa said.
"So again, the use of racially adjacent or racially elusive phrases such as Chinese virus, China flu was very prominent and overwhelmingly the kind of sentiment that was expressed when the term China or even Chinese was being expressed on all platforms (and) was incredibly negative in various ways."
Dog whistling, a subtle way of signaling a racist reference to others with the same belief, is another rhetorical mechanism.
Kurasawa said former US president Donald Trump had used such expressions with his pejorative references to China amid the pandemic.
"And this became so prevalent that in some ways the dog whistling became not only whistling that could be only heard by a certain group of people, but also was really quite open and that could be heard by others," Kurasawa said.
Today's Top News
- Confidence, resolve mark China's New Year outlook: China Daily editorial
- Key quotes from President Xi's 2026 New Year Address
- Full text: Chinese President Xi Jinping's 2026 New Year message
- Poll findings indicate Taiwan people's 'strong dissatisfaction' with DPP authorities
- Xi emphasizes strong start for 15th Five-Year Plan period
- PLA drills a stern warning to 'Taiwan independence' separatist forces, external interference: spokesperson




























