The United States has taken another step toward
building a new stockpile of up to 2,200 deployed nuclear weapons, a move that
would last well into the 21st century, a news report said Friday.
Thomas P. D'Agostino, head of defense programs for the National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), said on Thursday that the "Complex 2030" program
would repair or replace "inefficient, old and expensive (to maintain)"
facilities at eight sites, including some buildings going back to the 1940s
Manhattan Project that built the first atomic bombs.
The sites, primarily in California, New Mexico, Texas and Tennessee, "are not
sustainable for the long term," a report published by The Washington Post on
Friday quoted D'Agostino as saying.
The announcement came as U.S. President George W. Bush was pressing its
allies to take harsh steps to halt nuclear weapons programs in both the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Iran that it said were violations of
the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That same treaty called for the United
States and other members of the nuclear club to eliminate their own stockpiles,
but it gave no deadline by which that should take place.
The Bush administration's plan would replace the aging Cold War stockpile of
about 6,000 warheads with a smaller, more reliable arsenal that would last for
decades. It would also consolidate the handling of plutonium, the most dangerous
of the nuclear materials, in one center that would be built at a site that
already houses similar special materials. Another part of the plan would be to
remove all highly enriched uranium from the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory in California, D'Agostino said.
Key to the Bush plan was an expected decision in December by the NNSA on a
design for the new "Reliable Replacement Warhead" (RRW). The nation's two
nuclear weapons laboratories, Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore, are competing
for the new warhead design.
Before going ahead with any new warhead, however, the NNSA would have to get
Congress's approval to move into actual engineering development.
A requirement of the new design was that it must be based on nuclear packages
tested in the past so that it would not require the United States to break the
moratorium on underground tests to make certain the RRW would work, the report
said.
The process initiated Thursday would provide the public the first chance to
give its views on the Bush nuclear program. To carry out the rebuilding of the
complex, the agency must prepare updated environmental-impact statements for the
eight sites, including public comments, and hold hearings at each location, the
report said.