International force may be best option - Beckett (Reuters) Updated: 2006-07-18 17:01
The deployment of an international force to Lebanon may be the best way to
ensure any ceasefire agreed in the region is maintained, British Foreign
Secretary Margaret Beckett said on Tuesday.
 British Foreign
Secretary Margaret Beckett, seen here on 10 July 2006. Foreign diplomats
to London have been accused of criminal offences including child abuse and
sexual assault but escaped prosecution because of immunity, several
British Sunday newspapers.[AFP\File] |
As Israel bombarded Lebanon and said its offensive against Hizbollah could
take a few weeks, the guerrilla group backed by Syria and Iran was also firing
more rockets into the Jewish state.
"We believe there is a contribution that an international force can make,"
Beckett told BBC radio a day after world leaders at the Group of Eight summit in
Russia raised the possibility of sending in troops.
The United States has expressed caution about the idea.
Beckett said she was open to other suggestions but that Britain was exploring
the option of an international force with the United Nations and other nations.
"Everybody understands that at some point there will have to be a ceasefire,"
she said. "It will be much more difficult to get a ceasefire unless there is
some assurance on either side that the ceasefire can be maintained."
While there is little sign the two sides are about to call a ceasefire,
Beckett stressed that no one was talking about sending in soldiers to create
peace and acknowledged that getting together such a force would take
time.
|