WORLD / Newsmaker

Hwang 'faked' human cloning research
(China Daily)
Updated: 2006-01-11 05:56

A team led by a once-heralded and now disgraced South Korean scientist faked two landmark papers on embryonic stem cells but did produce the world's first cloned dog, an investigation panel said yesterday.

The panel at Seoul National University told reporters data was deliberately fabricated in papers produced by the team led by scientist Hwang Woo-suk. It described the case as scandalous.

South Korean supporters of compatriot stem-cell scientist Hwang Woo-suk, participate in a candle light vigil in front of Seoul National University in Seoul January 9, 2006.
South Korean supporters of compatriot stem-cell scientist Hwang Woo-suk, participate in a candle light vigil in front of Seoul National University in Seoul January 9, 2006. [Reuters]

Medical researchers say the episode which has shocked and shamed many South Koreans who had dubbed Hwang a hero is one of the biggest cases of scientific fraud in recent history.

"These individuals cannot be regarded to represent science in Korea," the panel said in an English-language statement.

The two papers finally debunked yesterday were a 2004 report on producing the first cloned human embryos for research and a 2005 paper on producing the first embryonic tailored stem cells. Both reports were published in the US periodical Science.

"Hwang's team did not have the data for the stem cell lines in the 2004 paper, but fabricated it," Chung Myung-hee, the head of the panel, told reporters.

Chung reiterated a finding in an interim report in late December that there was no data to prove Hwang's team produced tailored stem cells, as it claimed in the May 2005 paper.

That paper caused a sensation because the findings raised hopes that embryonic stem cells could one day be used to create genetically-specific tissue to treat ailments such as severe spinal cord injuries and Parkinson's disease.

"We concluded that Professor Hwang's team did not have patient-specific stem cell lines and did not have any scientific basis that the team made them," the panel said.
Page: 123