http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/business/worldbusiness/29trade.html
WASHINGTON, March 28 ¡ª Two of China's most relentless critics in Congress 
announced a temporary cease-fire on Tuesday in their long-running attack on 
China's foreign-exchange practices. 
In an about-face, Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, and 
Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, dropped plans for a bill 
that would threaten steep tariffs on Chinese imports if Chinese leaders refuse 
to let their currency, the yuan, rise in value against the dollar. 
Both lawmakers said they had become more optimistic as a result of their 
weeklong trip to China, where Chinese leaders emphasized their willingness to 
let their currency float more freely and to address other aspects of their 
nation's growing trade deficit with the United States. 
"We learned that the Chinese have come to a conclusion that a fixed currency 
is no good for China," Mr. Schumer said Tuesday. "We believe that the progress 
we have seen in the last two or three weeks will continue." 
Mr. Schumer and Mr. Graham said they would not demand a Senate vote on their 
bill, which would threaten China with a 27.5 percent tariff on all exports to 
the United States if it did not let its currency move in line with market 
forces. 
Though they said that they reserved the right to push for a vote by the end 
of September, the two senators made it clear they hoped to let the matter drop. 
China has kept its currency at an almost fixed exchange rate against the 
dollar for more than a decade, and American manufacturers have long complained 
that the yuan's low valuation has given Chinese imports an extra competitive 
edge. 
Political anxiety about China's huge trade surplus and its competitive 
pressure on American producers has risen in many quarters of Congress. The Bush 
administration, though a staunch defender of trade with China, has bluntly 
criticized Chinese leaders for failing to address a long list of trade 
complaints and has hinted it might accuse China of engaging in "currency 
manipulation." 
Mr. Schumer and Mr. Graham have been threatening to force a Senate vote on 
their bill for nearly two years, but they have repeatedly held back after 
receiving assurances that China was moving toward a more flexible exchange-rate 
policy. 
Last July, China announced a 2.1 increase in the value of the yuan and said 
it was moving away from a fixed exchange rate. But the yuan barely budged again 
until earlier this month, when the government allowed it to edge up another 1 
percent. 
As a practical matter, American companies are ambivalent about the entire 
issue. 
The National Association of Manufacturers has complained about China's 
exchange rates for years, but it has opposed the Schumer-Graham bill out of fear 
that it would imperil a trade relationship that is vital to many American 
companies. 
The group estimates that about a quarter of all manufactured goods from China 
come from subsidiaries of American companies. But that estimate does not include 
large volumes of imports from Chinese companies working as subcontractors to 
American manufacturers. 
Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa and Senator Max Baucus of Montana, 
respectively the top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, 
are pushing a separate bill that would focus more attention on currency policies 
but stop short of threatening tariffs on imported goods.