One company has even made a lucrative business by chemically analyzing wine
in its attempt to inform winemakers how their wine will ultimately score among
influential critics and how much each bottle will probably be worth once it hits
store shelves.
Enologix of Sonoma takes juice samples from grapes, chemically analyzes them
and then uses powerful software to generate taste recommendations on how to
tweak the wine as it ferments. The suggestions recommended by Enologix are aimed
at landing top scores from leading critics such as Robert Parker, who publishes
the influential Wine Advocate.
"People like me finally said to ourselves that we can compute and calculate
the outcome of anything ¡ª a stock or a wine," said Enologix founder Leo
McCloskey. "In the case of wine, we compute the price and what the national
critics will say."
McCloskey said his eight-person company consults with between 60 and 70
wineries a year and generates about $1.5 million in annual revenue.
He dismisses criticism that his use of chemistry compels his clients to
sacrifice creativity and diversity by brewing similarly tasting wines to please
the palates of a few powerful critics.
"It's a misconception to say we are all about chemistry," McCloskey said.
"I'm using industry-based insider knowledge to build a model for predicting wine
quality."
¡®Better wine through alchemy¡¯?
Still, many wineries are shunning such
technology and embracing distinctly Luddite, back-to-the Earth growing
techniques. That includes using things like "Preparation 500," the springtime
vineyard spray made from the manure-stuffed cow horns, buried over fall and
winter, then ground up and mixed with water and turned into a soil spray to
stimulate root growth.
"We're trying to make better wine through alchemy," joked Jim Fullmer,
director of the Philomath, Ore.-based Demeter Association, a nonprofit group
that certifies vineyards as "biodynamic" ¡ª a sort of hyper-organic designation
that means the vintner relies on such things as lunar cycles and planetary
alignment rather than chemistry.
"Biodynamics is probably the exact opposite," Fullmer said. "Winemaking is an
art."
Chemists such as Oregon State University's James Kennedy said that while
scientific "sophistication has definitely gone way up," no one is close to
turning wine into a monolithic, mass-produced and bland tasting product.
"That's a gross injustice to the complexity of the grape," said Kennedy, who
is trying to identify the chemicals responsible for giving red wines their
thick, bold textures in the mouth. "Grapes are too complex and no two vintages
are the same ¡ª it's very difficult to bring a Budweiser approach to wine
making."
| 1 | 2 |