Peace process uncertain in Mideast Gong ShaopengChina Daily Updated: 2006-02-06 06:24
The Islamic Resistance Movement, better known as Hamas, emerged from the
January 26 Palestinian legislative elections as the victor. It won 76 of the 132
available seats, enough for it to form a government on its own. In stark
contrast, the long dominant faction led by the Fatah movement won only 43 seats,
forcing the cabinet of Ahmed Qurei to resign en masse.
Shocking as it was to the rest of the world, Hamas' win should in no way be
seen as a surprise.
The latest legislative elections were conducted in a combination of two
formats: proportional representation for a nationwide single constituency and
majority representation for small town constituencies. That means 66 seats were
distributed among all political parties in proportion to the number of votes
each won in Gaza and the West Bank, while each of the other 66 went to
candidates who received simple majority support in their small town
constituencies.
The Hamas movement is a religious-group-turned-political party that has been
doing charity work around local mosques where its branches are based. It is
therefore only logical that it would win nearly all of the small town seats.
But for the Fatah movement, which has alienated itself from the masses by
indulging in complacency, winning more than half of the 66 seats in the
nationwide single constituency was obviously far from enough to avert a crushing
defeat when results from both fronts were put together. Small wonder then that
Nahmoud Abbas, Fatah chairman and president of the Palestinian government,
invited Hamas to form a new government as soon as the official election results
were out.
Since it was established in 1987, Hamas has never recognized the legitimacy
of Israel. Nor does it agree with the Oslo Treaty that Fatah signed with Israel,
or the Quartet Roadmap Plan. Its military arm also frequently launches suicide
bomb attacks against Israeli targets. If a "Hamas administration" comes to power
in Palestine, all parties involved in the Middle East peace process will face a
huge dilemma.
Motivated by the belief that democracy is one of the ultimate means of
ridding the world of terrorism, the Bush administration has been
enthusiastically promoting its "democratic solution" in the Middle East. It
persuaded other parties to agree to Hamas' participation in the Palestinian
elections, despite the fact that it still sees the militant group as a terrorist
organization.
Having considered every other possibility but a Hamas win, however, the White
House was compelled to join the other three parties of the quartet that drew up
the Middle East Peace Roadmap (the European Union, Russia and the United
Nations) in demanding that Hamas disarm itself, recognize Israel and respect the
Quartet Roadmap, or it would completely stop all assistance to Palestine. Hamas,
as expected, rejected the US demands immediately.
Hamas' shocking victory will also be felt in the Israeli parliamentary
elections on March 28. Since he ordered a unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza
Strip in August last year, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has seen his
popularity soar at home. In order to shake free from the constraints set by the
Benjamin Netanyahu-led faction of the Likud Party, Sharon formed his own Forward
Party in late 2005. Political pundits then predicted Sharon's popularity would
be able to help his party win enough votes in the March elections to become the
top dog and form a government.
The situation completely changed after Sharon was hospitalized on January 4
following a serious stroke. He remains in a deep coma, leaving all duties to his
second-in-charge, Ehud Olmert.
If a "Hamas administration" that refuses to negotiate with Israel comes to
power in Palestine, it might cost the Forward Party the edge over its rivals in
the upcoming elections. The hardliners led by Netanyahu could then re-dominate
Israeli politics and stop or even reverse the Middle East peace process.
In contrast to external anxiety, Abbas has appeared rather calm so far. By
inviting Hamas to form a new government, he in fact kicked the "awkward ball"
from under the feet of Hamas, whose lack of administrative experience and
capable bureaucrats will only spoil their electoral triumph.
Particularly clear is the certain loss of at least US$1.96 billion in annual
aid to cover administrative expenses, which means a dead government, if Hamas
does not change its ways. The prospect prompted Hamas to propose a joint
government with Fatah, but was quickly snubbed. According to the law, Abbas is
authorized to invite Fatah to form a new government if Hamas could not do it
within two months after the elections.
To put it simply, whether there will be a "Hamas administration" in Palestine
remains a question at the moment. Some people may think that inviting Hamas to
form a new government was a smart move by Abbas, but it was also a dangerous
one, if for nothing else but this foreseeable scenario: a Fatah cabinet
practically paralyzed by the Hamas-led opposition from the start.
The Palestine-Israel peace process has been in limbo for so long that any
further delay because of the political uncertainty in Palestine will only nudge
it closer to doom.
The author is a professor at the Beijing Institute of Foreign
Relations.
(China Daily 02/06/2006 page4)
|