US to cut combat troops in Iraq - Rumsfeld (AP) Updated: 2005-12-23 14:55 The president, Rumsfeld and other Bush administration and military officials
long have said that U.S. troop reductions would occur as the Iraqis show signs
of being able to take control of their country. As evidence of progress, these
officials in recent weeks have pointed to growing numbers of Iraqi troops they
say are capable of lead combat roles.
The American force peaked at 192,000 during the March 2003 invasion; the
monthly low was 109,000 in January 2004.
Earlier in Baghdad, Rumsfeld, on an unannounced trip to Iraq, was asked by
reporters whether he had decided to hold back the deployment of the 1st Brigade
of the 1st Infantry Division from Fort Riley, Kan., and the 2nd Brigade of the
1st Armored Division, now in Kuwait.
Rumsfeld would not answer directly, but then elaborated during his visit to
Fallujah.
Upon his arrival in the Iraqi capital, Rumsfeld met with Gen. George Casey,
the top US commander in Iraq, and Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to
Baghdad.
It was Rumsfeld's 11th trip to Iraq since the war began.
For the first time since the insurgency took hold in Iraq in midsummer 2003,
Rumsfeld was spending the night in the country. He previously had made Iraq day
trips but spent the night in other countries in the region.
The issue of troops reductions came up earlier during Rumsfeld's visit to
Afghanistan.
"Well, we're not going to withdraw precipitously. We're going to finish the
important work that's being done there," he responded.
During Rumsfeld's stop in Afghanistan, military officials said they were
making good progress toward eliminating the Taliban resistance and al-Qaida
terrorists who continue sporadical violence against US troops.
But some officers said the hostile forces were making some gains by acquiring
more advanced weaponry, such as armor-piercing munitions, and improving their
training and organization.
|