Home>News Center>China
       
 

Hong Kong name brand takes swipe at copycat
By Cao Li (China Daily)
Updated: 2005-10-12 05:44

SHANGHAI: When Sasa, a Hong Kong cosmetics brand, opened its first Shanghai branch in March it caused quite a stir among the city's fashion conscious.

And it also caused a bit of confusion a shop carrying exactly the same name had been operating in the city for years.

"It opened here ages ago and I buy things from it all the time," said the 29-year-old Miss Zhu.

"Its sign, plastic bags and customer card carry the same characters and letters as those of the shops I saw in Hong Kong."

The long established shop, however, has no connection whatsoever with the famous cosmetics maker, prompting the Hong Kong firm to file a lawsuit for trademark infringement and improper competition.

Shanghai No 2 Intermediate People's Court held the first hearing yesterday.

The Sasa Cosmetic (China) Company Limited is demanding the accused company to immediately cease using its name, publicly apologise and pay compensation of up to 622,000 yuan (US$76,700).

Sasa, founded in Hong Kong in 1978, registered its trademark, both Chinese and English, in Shanghai in 1997 and 1998 respectively, opening up a company branch and then an outlet in the city earlier this year.

"Our firm has a huge presence in the Asia-Pacific region, and the world," said Yang Guosheng, the lawyer of the company.

"The accused company has been using our name and relating itself to us inappropriately. Yang Ruijun, the boss of the accused company, who has been in the industry for years, must know exactly how famous our trademark is, therefore the infringement is intentional."

But the accused Shanghai Shasha Cosmetic Company denied it had attempted to steal the plaintiff's name and reputation.

"Sasa did not found any company or open any shop here in Shanghai before February of this year, therefore it cannot prove its influence before that," said Ding Yisheng, the lawyer for the Shanghai company.

And the Shanghai retailer claimed to be a legitimate company which obtained its name and business licence in 1998.

"The company name we use and the trademark of the plaintiff fall into different systems," said Ding.

Yang later told China Daily that there is still no law prohibiting companies from registering famous trademarks as their name, as long as it is not yet used locally.

The two companies agreed to enter mediation at the end of the hearing. The result of the discussions have yet to be announced.

(China Daily 10/12/2005 page3)



Shenzhou VI blasts off into sky
Celebrating Chongyang Festival
Astronauts for Shenzhou VI to be selected
  Today's Top News     Top China News
 

Second manned spacecraft successfully takes off

 

   
 

Next goals: Permanent space lab, and moon

 

   
 

AP: Chinese crew starts space mission

 

   
 

Reuters: Astronauts blast off into space

 

   
 

CPC sets blueprint for next five years

 

   
 

Chinese rescuers in Pakistan offer hope

 

   
  CPC sets blueprint for next five years
   
  Second manned spacecraft successfully takes off
   
  Next goals: Permanent space lab, and moon
   
  Reuters: Astronauts blast off into space
   
  Qing Dynasty vase may fetch record price
   
  China, US to hold 6th round of textile talks
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  It is time to prepare for Beijing - 2008  
Advertisement