Home>News Center>World
         
 

Mass. lawmakers reject gay marriage ban

(AP)
Updated: 2005-09-15 18:47

Both sides along the gay marriage divide have vowed to continue their fight a day after the state Legislature soundly defeated a proposed constitutional amendment seeking to ban same-sex marriage.


Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, center, speaks during a victory rally for gay marriage supporters at the Statehouse in Boston, Wednesday, Sept. 14, 2005, after the Massachusetts Legislature overwhelmingly rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that sought to ban gay marriage but legalize civil unions. [AP]

The vote means Massachusetts will remain the only state in the nation to allow same-sex couples to wed for now.

A year after lawmakers appeared destined to undo a court order that has allowed thousands of same-sex couples to marry since May 17, 2004, the Legislature voted 157-39 against the proposed constitutional amendment Wednesday.

Lawmakers were required to approve it in two consecutive sessions before the proposal could move to the statewide ballot in 2006 for a final decision by voters. The measure, which would have allowed Vermont-style civil unions, won passage by a 105-92 last year.

But the political and social landscape had changed dramatically since then.

Gone was the intensity, the seemingly endless debate and, in some quarters, the taste for stripping away the right to marry for gay and lesbian couples.

"Gay marriage has begun, and life has not changed for the citizens of the commonwealth, with the exception of those who can now marry," said state Sen. Brian Lees, a Republican who had been a co-sponsor of the amendment. "This amendment which was an appropriate measure or compromise a year ago, is no longer, I feel, a compromise today."

The moment the vote was announced, cheers erupted from the gay marriage supporters who watched the proceedings from the House chamber's public gallery.

"We have a lot of work ahead of us, but today we celebrate," Democrat Sen. Jarrett Barrios, an openly gay lawmaker, told the cheering crowd.

The proposal also was opposed by critics of gay marriage, who want to push for a more restrictive amendment that would ban both gay marriage and civil unions. The earliest that initiative could end up on the ballot is 2008.

"We're excited. We're pumped. This is great. This is exactly what we wanted," said Kris Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute.

The state's highest court ruled in November 2003 that same-sex couples had a right under the state constitution to marry. Now, more than 6,100 couples gay and lesbian couples have been wed in Massachusetts, though officials have barred out-of-state couples from getting married here.

Within a year of the first Massachusetts marriages, 11 states pushed through constitutional amendments banning gay marriage, joining six others that had done so earlier.

The Connecticut Legislature approved civil unions in April, joining Vermont in creating the designation that creates the same legal rights as marriage without calling it such. Earlier this month, California lawmakers passed a measure legalizing same-sex marriage, though Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has promised to veto it.



Suicide bombing kills at least 152 in Iraq
Afghanistan's President calls for increased support
Hurricane Ophelia
 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

Hu: China to provide US$10b for poor countries

 

   
 

US President Bush to visit China in November

 

   
 

PFP head James Soong in Shanghai for forum

 

   
 

China oil firm buys EnCana assets in Ecuador

 

   
 

At least 160 die in Iraq al-Qaida bombings

 

   
 

Four bombings kill at least 31 in Iraq

 

   
  Revised 9/11 panel report released
   
  Four bombings kill at least 31 in Iraq
   
  Aceh rebels set to hand over weapons under accord
   
  Annan seeks to restore UN credibility
   
  At least 160 die in Iraq al-Qaida bombings
   
  Hurricane Ophelia's heavy rains hit US coast
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement