Home>News Center>World
         
 

Israel OKs Gaza pullout in historic vote
(Agencies)
Updated: 2005-02-21 08:54

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Cabinet began charting Israel's future borders in a historic session Sunday, giving final approval to a withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and a revised route for the West Bank separation barrier that would move Israel's border closer to that of its original frontier.

With the vote, an Israeli government agreed for the first time since capturing the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 Mideast war to dismantle some of the dozens of Jewish settlements it has built there.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon talks with senior adviser Dov Weisglass prior to his speech to the Conference of Presidents dinner in Jerusalem, Sunday, Feb. 20, 2005. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Cabinet on Sunday began charting Israel's future borders in a historic session, giving final approval to a withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and a revised route of the West Bank separation barrier that would encompass at least 6 percent of land claimed by the Palestinians for a state. [AP]
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon talks with senior adviser Dov Weisglass prior to his speech to the Conference of Presidents dinner in Jerusalem, Sunday, Feb. 20, 2005. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Cabinet on Sunday began charting Israel's future borders in a historic session, giving final approval to a withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and a revised route of the West Bank separation barrier that would encompass at least 6 percent of land claimed by the Palestinians for a state. [AP]
However, approving the route of the barrier, Israel acted unilaterally on what was to be a key issue in peace talks with the Palestinians, and signaled it will keep a chunk of prime West Bank land close to Jerusalem, including two large Jewish settlement blocs.

While the Palestinians have balked at Israel's go-it-alone approach, they avoid declaring the moves a deal-breaker in a reinvigorated peace process.

"Israel is creating facts on the ground in the West Bank," Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi said. "Sharon wants payback in the West Bank for the disengagement from Gaza, particularly Jerusalem."

The Gaza withdrawal won approval from 17 Cabinet ministers, including eight from the moderate Labor Party, while five ministers from Sharon's ruling Likud Party voted against it.

Palestinians walk next to part of the Israeli security barrier in the West Bank town of Ram February 20, 2005. An expected Israeli cabinet vote on Sunday, the endorsement of a barrier route looping around Jewish settlement blocs in the West Bank, added to Palestinians' fears Israel was cementing its grip on large swathes of territory they also seek. [Reuters]
Palestinians walk next to part of the Israeli security barrier in the West Bank town of Ram February 20, 2005. An expected Israeli cabinet vote on Sunday, the endorsement of a barrier route looping around Jewish settlement blocs in the West Bank, added to Palestinians' fears Israel was cementing its grip on large swathes of territory they also seek. [Reuters]
Sharon, a former settler patron, said the dismantling of 21 settlements in Gaza and four in the West Bank is vital for Israel's security. He later signed an order requiring some 9,000 settlers to leave their homes in these areas by July 20 or face removal by force.

"Israel has taken a step that will be decisive for its future ... the right one to ensure Israel's future as a Jewish and democratic state," he told American Jewish leaders in Jerusalem. He said the vote proved Israel's readiness to take "painful steps ... to make peace."

The easy endorsement appeared to be the final political defeat for withdrawal opponents, including the powerful Jewish settler lobby. The pullout could still be derailed if Sharon fails to get his 2005 budget passed by parliament by the end of March.

"This is a historic decision, but we are facing a very difficult period," Justice Minister Tzipi Livni said of expected settler confrontations with troops.

Pinchas Wallerstein, a leader of the council of Jewish settlements, called on supporters to begin "an aggressive and strong struggle," but to avoid violent confrontations with Israeli troops.

The militant Hamas group, meanwhile, claimed victory. Musher al-Masri, a Hamas spokesman in Gaza, called the Israeli pullout "a result of the heroic resistance of our people."

Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz told the Cabinet thousands of troops would take part in dismantling the settlements in a four-stage withdrawal. The Cabinet has not decided in which order the settlements will be removed.

In an equally momentous vote, Cabinet ministers approved the final route of the 425-mile separation barrier, but encompassing more than 6 percent of West Bank land, including the large Jewish settlement blocs of Gush Etzion and Maaleh Adumim, both near Jerusalem.

Construction of the West Bank barrier began in 2002 and is one-third complete. Israel said it needed a shield against Palestinian suicide bombers and gunmen. The Palestinians denounced the barrier as a land grab, saying Israel could have built it on its land. Last year, the world court said in a nonbinding opinion that the construction of the barrier is illegal and should stop.

The route originally proposed by army planners would have sliced off nearly one-fifth of the West Bank, but large segments were struck down by Israel's Supreme Court as causing too much hardship for Palestinians.

By a vote of 20-1 with one abstention, the Cabinet approved the revised path that is closer to Israel's pre-1967 boundary with the West Bank. But in the Jerusalem area the new route dips deep into the West Bank, a path that could undercut the Palestinians' attempt to establish their future capital in the eastern sector of the city, abutting the West Bank.

Several Cabinet ministers acknowledged that while the barrier might have been conceived as a temporary defense against Palestinian attacks, it also would help determine final borders.

"The route of the fence is significant in terms of future negotiations over Israel's borders," Livni said.

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas told the German news magazine Der Spiegel that Israel must dismantle all settlements and halt construction of the barrier. "What right does Israel have to build settlements on our land?" Abbas said.

Sharon has said he has U.S. blessing for holding on to large West Bank settlement blocs in a future peace deal. Last year, US President Bush affirmed to Sharon in a letter that "new realities" in the West Bank, meaning concentrations of Israeli settlers, could not be overlooked in drawing future borders.

"The American letter to Sharon is unacceptable because it pre-empts solutions for a final phase we haven't reached yet," Abbas told Der Spiegel, saying Bush cannot determine the Palestinians' fate.

In other developments Sunday:

_ Israel announced it would free 500 prisoners on Monday, in accordance with agreements reached at an Israeli-Palestinian summit earlier this month.

_ Israeli troops killed one Palestinian and wounded another on suspicion they tried to smuggle arms from Egypt to Gaza. A third man was arrested for interrogation, the army said.



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

Group plans to lease, develop Diaoyudao

 

   
 

Private airlines ready to take off in China

 

   
 

Senior Chinese official consults DPRK

 

   
 

Medical research on stem cells to continue

 

   
 

US-Japan statement on Taiwan opposed

 

   
 

Eight suicide bombings in Baghdad kill 55

 

   
  Israel OKs Gaza pullout in historic vote
   
  Bush lands in Europe, aiming to mend ties
   
  U.S., Iraqis launch anti-insurgent drive
   
  Chief UN spokesman to step down in June
   
  Bush harbors no bitterness toward Chirac
   
  UN still at odds on human cloning
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  Related Stories  
   
New Gaza violence strains de facto truce
   
Sharon, Peres reach deal on Israel unity government
   
Palestinians to deploy forces to halt attacks
   
Israeli troops kill 9 Palestinians in Gaza raid
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement