US, EU, India recall envoys from Nepal (Agencies) Updated: 2005-02-15 14:33
![US Ambassador to Nepal James Francis Moriarty speaks to the press. Nepal came under international pressure after the United States, European Union and India recalled their ambassadors from the Himalayan outpost to protest King Gyanendra's seizure of absolute power. [AFP]](xin_070202151522877127772.jpg) US Ambassador to
Nepal James Francis Moriarty speaks to the press. Nepal came under
international pressure after the United States, European Union and
India recalled their ambassadors from the Himalayan outpost to protest
King Gyanendra's seizure of absolute power.
[AFP] | WASHINGTON - Nepal came under
international pressure after the United States, European Union and India
recalled their ambassadors from the Himalayan outpost to protest King
Gyanendra's seizure of absolute power.
The US State Department indicated of possible international action if the
king refused to heed calls to restore fundamental rights.
"The recall of our ambassador, along with the ambassadors of the United
Kingdom, India and France, who are also leaving Kathmandu today, I think is an
indication of the deep concern in the international community about the recent
developments in Nepal," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher told
reporters.
"These are widely shared among nations of the international community.
In Paris, French foreign ministry spokesman Herve Ladsous said: "In light of
recent events in Nepal, we have decided -- along with our European partners --
to recall EU ambassadors living in Kathmandu for consultations."
On February 1, Nepal's King Gyanendra sacked the government, appointed a
pro-royalist cabinet headed by himself and declared a state of emergency in the
Himalayan kingdom.
Boucher said the United States had "made clear the point" that the king
needed to restore and protect civil and human rights.
Gyanendra should also release those detained under the state of emergency and
move quickly toward restoration of civil liberties and multi-party, democratic
institutions, he added.
 The US ambassador
to Nepal has been asked to return to Washington for consultations the
State Department said, two weeks after that country's King Gyanendra, seen
here 13 February 2005, sacked the government, declared a state of
emergency, and took absolute power. [AFP] | "We will consult with our ambassador and others will consult with their
ambassadors about how best to achieve those goals, how we can support those
goals," Boucher said.
"And we'll be sending our ambassador back after a (week) in order to convey
that message even more clearly," he said.
Whatever steps taken by the international community would be aimed at
"supporting the Nepalese people's quest for democracy, peace, security and
development," he added.
India's envoy to Nepal, Shiv Shankar Mukherjee, who returned to New Delhi on
Monday, had called on the foreign minister Natwar Singh, and briefed him on the
latest developments in the restive Himalayan kingdom and his talks with King
Gyandendra last week.
Analysts say that among the first actions to be taken if the Nepalese king
refused to budge would be freezing military aid to the impoverished nation
fighting an uphill battle to supress a Maoist insurgency, which has claimed more
than 11,000 lives so far.
The United States, Britain and India, Nepal's giant neighbor India have been
key backers of Nepal in its drive to crush communist insurgents wanting to set
up a republic.
The United States had allocated 45 million dollars in aid for Nepal in the
year to September 2004, 10 percent of which was for security, a US official
said. For fiscal 2005, 44 million dollars has been set aside with only one third
for security related activities.
Britain reportedly is also reviewing defense assistance of 6.5 million pounds
(about 12 million dollars) while New Delhi has supplied the ill-equipped
Nepalese army with helicopters, guns and other equipment.
Gyanendra said he sacked the government because it failed to quell what is
believed to be the worlds fastest flourishing and most successful rebel movement
in the post-Cold War period.
The rebels said Monday they would fight to the finish to oust the king and
his "autocratic regime."
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Today's
Top News |
|
|
|
Top World
News |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|