|
Media seek end to Jackson gag order
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-05-15 15:50
In court documents filed Friday, Michael Jackson's attorneys agreed with
prosecutors that people involved in the superstar's child molestation case
should continue to be barred from discussing it publicly.
Pop star Michael Jackson reaches
for his umbrella as he leaves the Santa Maria Courthouse with his sister
Janet, left, following his arraignment arraignment on sexual molestation
charges Friday, Jan 16, 2004, in Santa Maria, Calif.
[AP] | Attorneys representing the media,
meanwhile, criticized the court-imposed gag order and Santa Barbara County
prosecutors' attempt to uphold it.
"Eliminating the gag order will ensure that more accurate information will be
disseminated, and will reduce the amount of rumors, speculation and gossip about
which the District Attorney complains," wrote attorney Theodore Boutrous, who
represents various news organizations, including The Associated Press.
The lawyers submitted arguments to the state Supreme Court, which is deciding
whether to hear the case over whether the gag order should be lifted.
District Attorney Thomas Sneddon submitted a letter to the court saying the
gag order is important to keep an untainted pool of potential jurors. Sneddon
criticized the media in the letter, saying it has pandered to a "gossip-hungry"
audience.
Jackson's attorney Thomas Mesereau wrote that he and his client support the
gag order and withdrew any objections to it made by Jackson's prior counsel.
Calls left for Mesereau on Friday were not immediately returned.
Jackson has pleaded not guilty to charges of child molestation and a
conspiracy count involving allegations of child abduction, false imprisonment
and extortion.
Prosecutors have attempted to keep secret many developments in the case. One
sealed document — the bench warrant for Jackson's arrest — was released
Thursday.
Boutrous argued the gag order is unconstitutional, and said prosecutors want
to choose how details of the case should be released.
"The District Attorney would prefer to be able to file serious felony charges
against citizens without being bothered by public scrutiny and evidence, but
that is simply not the way our democratic system operates," Boutrous said.
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's
Top News |
|
|
|
Top Life
News |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
