TV images driving public discourse on war (Agencies) Updated: 2004-05-14 09:02 Until stomach-churning pictures emerged of naked
Iraqi prisoners stacked like firewood or held at the end of a leash by their
American captors, wartime prison abuse was a virtual non-story.
Similarly, the death of American Nick Berg in Iraq may have been little more
than a footnote until video was posted Tuesday showing an executioner cutting
off the man's head with a knife.
 A blindfolded man
described as an Iraqi-American held prisoner in Iraq is shown here in
this image aired by the Arab television station Al Arabiya, Thursday, May
6, 2004. The man speaking in English, gave his name as Aban Elias and said
he worked with the Pentagon as a civilian engineer.
[AP] | To most of the world, Iraq is a war of
images. Pictures can drive public opinion and policy: the statue of Saddam
Hussein toppling in Baghdad, U.S. President Bush standing on an
aircraft carrier in front of a "mission accomplished" sign, the charred bodies
of four contractors who had driven into disaster.
"It doesn't become real for a lot of people until they see it," said Edward
Trayes, a photojournalism professor at Temple University. "It's truth in a way
that even words don't describe."
Past wars have produced similar iconic images. The soldiers raising the
American flag on Iwo Jima in World War II became a symbol of determination and
triumph, while a naked girl running away from a napalm attack spoke to Vietnam's
inhumanity.
Historians don't discount the cumulative impact of nightly news reports on
American deaths in turning many Americans against the Vietnam War.
A ban on media coverage of coffins arriving from Iraq also shows the
government's awareness of the potency of images.
What makes Iraq different is there are so many more potential sources for
images, and technology — digital cameras, the Web, live television cameras — can
make them available almost instantaneously, said Jay Rosen, a journalism
professor at New York University.
That's coupled with a deeply divided world eager to seize on images that
prove their political points, he said.
Berg's body was found last Saturday. The first media reports of the discovery
were filed Tuesday, only hours before existence of the video became known. Few,
if any, media outlets showed the beheading, although some depicted a knife held
to Berg's head. The ominous, hooded assailants and Berg's obvious terror told
the story visually.
In the two weeks since CBS' "60 Minutes II" first broadcast pictures of
American soldiers allegedly mistreating Iraqi prisoners, there's been a
congressional probe, calls for the ouster of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
and worldwide expressions of revulsion.
Yet the military had known about the allegations for months. Newspapers and
television didn't ignore the story, but it was generally off the public radar.
"What would have happened to this story if there weren't pictures?" asked
Jeff Fager, executive producer of "60 Minutes II. "I bet you not much would have
come of it."
"60 Minutes II" began its investigation not after hearing abuse reports, but
after hearing there were photos, Fager said.
Army private Lynndie England was shown in one picture smiling and pointing to
the genitals of a prisoner. England, who said she was following orders, has
become a visual symbol of the scandal.
A poll released Wednesday by the Pew Research enter found that 76 percent of
Americans had seen the pictures.
The Pew poll indicates they've had an impact. After the pictures were
released, a majority of Pew survey respondents — 51 percent — said for the first
time that the war in Iraq was not going well.
Like many newspapers, the News-Sun in Springfield, Ohio wrote little about
the charges until there were pictures, said editor Karla Garrett Harshaw.
"When you see those images, it just has a different feel," Harshaw said. "It
evokes more emotion because you see it. (You think) my goodness, how could they
do that?"
The Associated Press reported in detail last fall about former Iraqi
prisoners complaining of abuse, including attacks by dogs and people being tied
up and punished by spending hours in the sun.
Similarly, CNN reported on a military investigation into alleged abuses on
Jan. 16. The report mentioned the possibility of photos, although CNN didn't get
the pictures.
Rumsfeld, during his May 7 testimony to Congress, mentioned those reports:
"Everyone knew it," he said. "CNN was there, asking questions."
Even after the "60 Minutes II" report, there was an odd public pause before
the impact sunk in. ABC's "World News Tonight" didn't know how to respond and
waited two nights to do its first story on the controversy, its chief producer
said.
It seemed to hit the news more quickly in Europe, CBS' Fager said.
"I was surprised," he said. "I thought it would get a much bigger initial
reaction than it did."
CNN Pentagon reporter Barbara Starr, who reported on the alleged abuse
at least four times before the pictures came out, said they illustrated a
breakdown in military discipline that hadn't been seen in generations. The U.S.
military was cast in the unfamiliar public role of bad guys.
The episode should be a lesson for the news media, Starr said.
"It's very clear that potentially terrible abuses were taking place," she
said, "and it didn't become a big story until people could see these virtually
pornographic images."
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Today's
Top News |
|
|
|
Top World
News |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|