Japanese model
Japan is the world's second strongest protector of intellectual property
rights (IPR), so it's not surprising that it pays a lot of attention to IPR
education. The subject was even added to its university courses in the
early-1980s. The country established a national development strategy in April
2002 that required all industries to emphasize IPR protection, raise public
awareness and knowledge of patent protection, and encourage the government to
develop a talent pool of IPR professionals.
The strategy also said that Japan would promote IPR education in primary and
middle schools by providing textbooks geared at developing IPR awareness by
focusing on the importance of creativity. Discussions were held among teachers
on IPR-related topics to further enhance their awareness, and people were
encouraged to learn about the great inventions of the past. Citizens were urged
to work on their ideas so that they could understand the need to protect IPR on
a more personal level.
The Japanese Patent Office (JPO) has played a major role in promoting IPR
education throughout the country. It prepares and provides free textbooks on IPR
to a number of schools, for example. In 2002 alone, it provided learning
materials to 2,500 primary schools, 1,500 junior high schools and 450 senior
high schools. It also provided books to public libraries and science museums.
The JPO strengthened the IPR teaching force by co-operating with local
educational committees to launch forums and train teachers about the importance
of creativity and IPR protection. It also researched ways of emphasizing the
importance of IPR education in the overall education system.
US methods
IPR education is primarily implemented in the United States through basic
rather than senior courses. According to an investigation of 50 law schools said
to offer comprehensive IPR educational programes, "Introduction to Copyrights"
is the most popular course in the country. Forty-eight of the 50 law schools
surveyed offer introductory courses on copyrights. "Introduction to Patents and
Trademarks" is the second most popular course, "Introduction to IPR" ranks third
(35/50) and "International IPR Protection" is fourth. Although some law schools
that offer excellent IPR programmes also provide these courses, they are not
seen as elite institutions.
If they have teaching facilities, faculty and students, some law schools will
open senior courses on patents, trademarks and copyrights. Only after they have
provided these basic and senior courses will these schools offer more
professional IPR programmes, including classes on patent infringement law,
patent damages law, business confidentiality law and international IPR law. Most
law schools rarely provide such courses, however, because they require competent
professors and interested students. Only institutions known to offer quality and
professional IPR programmes would have these more senior courses
On November 21, 2005, China's State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) and
the WIPO jointly launched the "National Senior Forum on IPR Education in China"
in Foshan, in South China's Guangdong Province. The list of keynote speakers was
impressive: Mpazi Sinjela, dean of WIPO's Worldwide Academy; Chang Cheng, senior
counsellor of WIPO's Asian-Pacific Development Authority; Song Hai,
vice-governor of Guangdong; Li Yuguang, deputy commissioner of SIPO; and Liang
Shaotang, mayor of Foshan.
The three-day forum discussed China's basic IPR education programmes, the
relationship between IPR awareness and schools, IPR education in colleges and
universities, and after-school professional training on IPR issues.
Li said in his speech that a stable IPR system has existed for more than 200
years. It is still new compared with conventional property rights and creditors'
rights, however. IPR have a history of more than 20 years in China. An effective
way to promote awareness is to quickly popularize the subject and educate
people.
"Foshan has made some great achievements in that area, which is why the forum
was held in the city," Li said.
Sinjela highlighted three significant points regarding experimental IPR
educational initiatives in Foshan's Nanhai District. First, it is important to
teach children about IPR. Second, children should be taught not to infringe on
other people's IPR. Third, adults should be encouraged to be creative, and
should know that their IPR can be protected. This will accelerate social
development.
It is a time consuming task, however. Most Chinese enterprises are not aware
of IPR protection and do not know how to protect their own copyrights in the
global marketplace. Although the government has introduced several important IPR
projects, they have only been temporary solutions to a big problem. A final,
comprehensive approach would be for China to include IPR education in its
national development strategies and encourage enterprises to be creative and
apply for more patents.
China's top leaders, including President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao,
have continually stressed the importance of IPR. In January 2005, a special
working group was set up after approval from the State Council to form a
national IPR strategy. The group is led by Vice-Premier Wu Yi, and includes 28
directors from SIPO.
Recent measures have included enhancing IPR education, cultivating competent
professionals, changing the legal system to protect IPR, encouraging creativity,
increasing the number of patents, introducing IPR management systems in a range
of organizations and enterprises, facilitating the industrialization of patents,
accelerating efforts to establish an inquiry and service system on IPR, setting
up efficient warning systems, quickening the establishment of intermediary
agencies, and actively pursuing the establishment of a favourable global IPR
environment.
Chinese government officials, enterprises and ordinary citizens are improving
their awareness and knowledge of IPR. It is widely agreed that it's a very
important issue and that China needs to become a country of creativity if it
hopes to develop further. Effective IPR strategies are of great significance to
the country's future.
State Intellectual Property Office
(For more biz stories, please visit Industry Updates)