Deal with Washington heightens nuclear fears in Sweden

STOCKHOLM — Swedish lawmakers voted on Tuesday on a controversial defense deal with the United States, which critics fear could lead to the deployment of nuclear weapons and permanent US bases on Swedish soil.

The Defense Cooperation Agreement, or DCA, is a major step for a country that ended two centuries of neutrality to join NATO in March.

Signed by Stockholm and Washington in December, the deal would give the US access to 17 military bases and training areas in Sweden, and allow the storage of weapons, military equipment and ammunition in the country.

Opponents say the agreement should state outright that Sweden will not allow nuclear weapons on its territory.

"The agreement has no limits," said Daniel Hellden, co-leader of the opposition Green Party, which together with the Left Party opposes the DCA.

"It opens up nuclear weapons on Swedish soil ... And it is so vaguely written that the government could even allow them in peacetime," he told SR public radio on Monday. "We're going to be a target for nuclear weapons. We're going to have 17 bases where the Americans can store material."

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson's center-right minority government, propped up by the far-right Sweden Democrats, has insisted the deal respects Swedish sovereignty.

"Sweden is a sovereign nation and it will always be Sweden that decides what type of weapons we allow," Defense Minister Pal Jonson told SR. "Parliament has already agreed that we will never need permanent bases or nuclear weapons on Swedish territory and that was specified in our NATO accession."

For the bill to pass on Tuesday, it has to win a 75 percent majority that includes the votes of more than half of the Riksdag legislature's 349 MPs.

The Left and Green parties, which both voted against Sweden's NATO membership, together hold just 42 seats — not enough to block the agreement's adoption on their own.

'Foolish' handling

In an op-ed in the Aftonbladet daily on Sunday, two Left Party MPs called the government's handling of the agreement "not just naive, but downright foolish".

They said the DCA makes Sweden less safe because "US defense and security policy is based on nuclear weapons".

"Nuclear weapons are a threat to mankind. That the government hasn't demanded any guarantees against such a brutal weapon of mass destruction is terrifying," they wrote.

The Swedish Peace and Arbitration Society, one of the biggest critics of the move, said two successive Swedish governments insisted during the NATO application process that Sweden would have the same stance on nuclear weapons as neighboring Denmark and Norway.

"But unlike Norway's and Denmark's DCA agreements, there is no clause in Sweden's agreement against nuclear weapons being brought into or placed in Sweden," Kerstin Bergea, president of the Swedish Peace and Arbitration Society, wrote in another op-ed.

Kristersson made headlines last month when he opened the door for the possibility of nuclear weapons in Sweden during wartime.

The two Left MPs wrote: "That's an incredible statement and is totally the opposite of what the Swedish people think and what Sweden has long stood for."

Bergea questioned whether Sweden would be able to put a brake on the US. "An agreement based solely on confidence is not enough in important matters such as these," she said.

Agencies Via Xinhua